Lean implementation and consultants

Edivaldo Loreto, ANALISTA CORPORATIVO DE MANUFATURA, São Paulo Area, Brazil posted on LinkedIn
Discussion – We are trying to implement Lean in the company I work but seems to be impossible without the help of a consultant.

One response was:
Many of us consultants have been in your shoes or know of those who have. When first introduced to lean and flow concepts as a Plant Manager, I needed guidance in implementation. It is not that there isn’t a desire to succeed but a lack of experience in implemention. Having a tested roadmap to follow and being guided by those who have successfully traveled that road can make a big difference in time and cost savings.
As consultants we provide training, guidance, and assistance. For long term success, consultants need to transfer an undestanding of lean concepts to the company personnel; you don’t want us there forever. There must be a core knowledge base that grows and becomes the new way of doing business.

Your thoughts!

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Lean in ETO manufacturing

Federico Murari, Manager Costing at Alstom Power in Switzerland posted the following on LinkedIn on April 12
• Discussion: What about Lean in ETO (Engineering to Order) manufacturing? Every book I read, every article I screen is always claiming big benefits and examples from standard, Make to Stock type of business…… We all agree that Lean Six Sigma methodologies are powerful tools, but are they applicable in every type of manufacturing concept? Can you apply for example leveling and kamban in ETO?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts….

One response follows:
In an ETO environment one needs to look at the entire cash conversion cycle, order to ship, to identify opportunities. One major objective of Lean Six Sigma is to improve response to the customer. In most ETO companies, the areas adding the most ot the lead time are typically order entry and engineering. This is where you might find waste that can be eliminated. What is the real work content time Vs. lead time?
In the manufacturing area, are there common components? If so, these might be candidates for applying Kanban techniques. For the low volume, one-of-a-kind components, you are dependent upon the supplier lead times.
Even in engineer/make to order manufacturing companies, there is often waste found in the production processes. The equipment stays the same; how it is used might change. Look for waste/non-value added activity within the processes.
Mapping the processes might assist in identifying if and where waste can be eliminated and response time improved.

What are your thoughts?

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Process Optimization: Class III Medical Device Manufacturing

Implementing the strategies of lean and flow technologies in the world of Class III device manufacturing offers unique challenges. Besides properly updating procedures, as should be done in any process conversion, the requirements of the FDA which guide the quality engineers and the customer requirements must be addressed. There must be training, testing the new processes, pilot builds to verify quality and consistency as well as meeting customer demand, and only after quality engineering gives their approval is the customer approval sought. In this case the conversion took about 8 months.

Before conversion, the product was built in batches averaging 30 units per month. Once scheduled for the month, it was very difficult for the customer to adjust demand. Often the customer was not getting product when it wanted and they were seeking another supplier.

Once the monthly demand was defined, a pick list was created and sent to stores. Each part from the smallest screw to the housing was individually counted, bagged, and tagged then wrapped onto a pallet. The pallet was delivered to the production line where the pallet was broken, bags opened, parts recounted, and then stocked. If there were discrepancies, forms were completed, signed and approved by the supervisor, then processed. Nearly a week into the month and no product produced.

Once begun, all assemblies were built in a batch. After each and every step, the sub-assembly batches had to be taken to an inspector. By the time all the subs were built and inspected and assuming there was no rework, a unit will have traveled over 900 feet and it took 20 days or more to complete the batch; yes there was usually overtime needed. The company was seldom on time in delivery. The customer was about to decertify this company as a supplier.

When the process redesign was complete, one unit at a time was built. Instead of an in-process inspector, the assemblers checked each other’s work. The final QC was done by the quality team. This required a change in the process approved by both the quality engineer and the customer. Throughput capability increased to 4 units a day. The on-time delivery improved from 60% to 99%. Quality was dramatically improved.

The amount of material in the process was reduced from 30 days to 5 days. A resupply location was created between the line and stores. The stores team stocked the resupply location as parts were consumed. The production team stocked the workstations. There was more visibility to inventory levels and stock-outs due to internal issues were virtually eliminated.

The results! The customer stopped looking for another supplier; instead it increased demand. The customer set high delivery and quality expectations which were monitored, published for all to see, and continuously exceeded. The customer awarded its Supplier Excellence Award. Visibility into the finished goods inventory was later provided and the customer ordered directly from inventory. This pull became the signal to produce. Even on a dedicated Class III medical devise product line implementation of Process Optimization tools can provide significant benefits.

Your thoughts?

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Process Optimization: Reduce Costs, Add Cash

Process Optimization is a methodology for removing waste from business processes, reducing costs, improving productivity, and adding cash to the balance sheet. It is a series of tools designed to provide both short and long term benefits by institutionalizing consistency and a focus on continuous process improvement. It is a mindset, a way of doing business. To be successful, it must become ingrained into the culture and fully supported by management at all levels.

Many business leaders, from all types of businesses, healthcare to manufacturing, instinctively know there are opportunities for improvement buried within many of the company’s processes. The question is how to define these opportunities and then make lasting improvements.

Some examples of waste and poor productivity include: excessive time processing orders, invoices, or claims, employees waiting, too many administrative errors, transactions or paperwork gets lost, too many transactions, too much inventory, procedures are not clearly understood by all nor consistently applied and followed, or time is wasted looking for tools or documents that should be readily available. If the organization is experiencing any of these, or countless other issues, valuable time and money are being wasted.

Implementing Process Optimization requires following a series of steps designed to maintain control as well as deliver benefits. First there must be senior management commitment to success. This is followed by education and training to ensure consistent understanding and application of the business philosophy. Senior management establishes a plan with defined milestones and ensures metrics reinforce the new way of doing business. Senior management also selects one or two teams of subject matter experts to execute the plan.

A set of processes, target area, are selected. The target area must provide measurable improvement in a reasonable time to ensure continued success. The time frame should be measured in weeks, not months.

Once the target area is selected, begin by establishing a benchmark; define the current metrics without which it will be difficult to identify improvement. Create a process flow diagram of the processes as they currently are and measure each step. DO NOT redesign at this point. If you don’t know where you are, it will be difficult defining where you are going and impossible to define when you arrive.

Collect all the measurements. The team analyzes the process flows and steps within the processes to identify waste and improvement opportunities. All steps are thoroughly examined to identify waste. Some of the waste can be immediately reduced or eliminated; some will take more time and study to effect lasting reduction or elimination. The team defines strategies for making improvements and develops the future process flow diagram. Measurable improvements are quantified. The team consults with process owners and management to gain agreement and funding, if necessary, to implement the redesigned processes.

Define the resources required and a timeframe to implement the new process flow. An important ingredient to success is training and cross training those working in the process the new standard work steps that have been designed. Standard work instructions must be updated.

During implementation, it is important not to interrupt serving the customers. In a manufacturing environment, this might require building finished goods inventory. In a healthcare facility, this might mean working over the weekend or scheduling resources to minimize disruption.

Once the new process flow is in place and tested, it must be formalized. If not already complete, as would be required in a controlled environment like a healthcare facility, procedures must be updated to support the new processes. Metrics must reinforce the new ways, not be a disincentive. Lastly, celebrate success and move onto the next opportunity.

The following example of a sales order process identifies the waste associated with batching the sales orders. An individual order that has less than 10 minutes of value added work content is taking 4 to 6 hours to process. This impacts not only sales order entry but all downstream processes and most importantly customer response time.

Example: Sales Order Process Flow – Before (batch order processing)

Order waiting Code Orders await Orders wait Highlight Order
on fax order printing on batch print specific into “IN”
instructions tray

Customer Retrieve Enter Print Remove Separate Order
Sends Fax Batch Order pack slips printed slips slips awaits
batch separation

4 – 6 hours

After the current sales order process was mapped, several areas of waste were identified. By redefining the process and the standard work within the process, several of the non-value added steps were eliminated. Orders were processed one at a time. The resources needed to process the orders were re-arranged to be closer and in sight of one another.

Example: Sales Order Process Flow – After (individual order processing)

Order waiting Enter Place order
on fax order into ”IN” tray

Customer Get Print
sends Fax order pack slip

10 minutes

Work flows need to be balanced as well optimized. Process Optimization has series of tools and techniques used to design processes so work can be performed with minimal or no interruptions, bottlenecks, wait, or wasted time. Imbalances, or bottlenecks, in the work flows need to be addressed to ensure optimum flows.

As processes are redefined and realigned, 5S+1 is implemented to ensure there is a place for everything and everything is in its place with rules and procedures developed to ensure long term success. Team members from the area being addressed are asked to sort the needed from the unneeded and assist in straightening and identifying. They establish sweeping rules to keep the area organized and standardize the procedures. Management helps sustain the gains with support and audits. The +1 is for Safety, a top priority in any environment. The following are before and after examples of two 5S+1 efforts, one in the office and one in a manufacturing environment.

In The Office

Before 5S+1 After 5S+1

On the Production Floor

Before 5S+1 After 5S+1

Implementing Process Optimization is rarely as easy as it might sound here but the benefits can be impressive. The processes are more predictable and easier to measure. Work is more consistent resulting in improved quality. It is a management by sight technology that makes it easier to identify and resolve problems. Whenever a process is subjected to the tools of Process Optimization it improves and costs are reduced, how much will vary process to process.

All organizations, profit or non-profit, from banking to healthcare to manufacturing, have processes with potential cost savings and productivity improvement. Consider implementing the tools of Process Optimization within you organization, you will build the path to excellence for your Company.

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Improvements in Healthcare challenges

The health care dilemma is one of complexity, inadequate education and leadership. The complexity piece is easily understood when you look at any medical record, hospital or emergent care process and the logistics associated to care for the patient. Education is harder to believe as anyone in healthcare knows how much training is involved to work in this field. The void in knowledge with the industry is operations management, change culture and organizational effectiveness, there are many other aspects of process improvement that fall into this educatoin void but probably the largest is leadership and team building. Without these aspects for improvement the innovations are limited to small islands of individuals. Numerous improvement initiatives as suggested by the HBR author are one way to breaks these barriers however the education and leadership aspects will have to be addressed to create and support true innovation in healthcare.

THis is an industry plagued with regulation and engrained culture that has not included and even prohibited much “state of the art” operational excellence. For some excellent views on this topic there is an associated blog in Harvard Business Review Blogspace, reference blogs.hbr.org entitled “Why Innovation Is So Hard in Health Care – and How to Do It Anyway”. This is an industry and topic that will require this type of attention for the foreseeable future.

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Leave a comment

Demand Based Supply Methodologies for the Company that aims at Market Leadership

For those of us that have lived through the forecast driven methods of planning and executing production and supply response through any supply chain, we know that the one consistency in forecast planning is that there will be errors. Reuslts are what drive us through the days of expediting and explanations to customers or superiors about how we need to make up the difference. There are now countless efforts being placed on S&OP processes, elaborate planning methodologies at the consumer level and retailers to get more accurate forecasts. IN the end a forecast of 80% accuracy is about as good as one will ever find and of course the further into the future the periods extend the less accurate they are.

Don’t get me wrong there is nothing wrong with these tools to gain more accurate forecasts because we will always need a forecast to plan business resources to including materials, especially long term material contracts. We just need to look at alternatives that are being developed today to help mitigate the issues with forecast driven schedules. One good discussion I have seen just this past week was to determine how to incorporate safety stock into a inventory plan and/or demand plan, reference https://community.kinaxis.com/ ” Is it appropriate to add safety stock to forecasted finished goods plan.”

The best practices I have seen take the supply capability in terms of mix, volume and order to ship response and align these cycles with logistics to set cycles of replenishment. These cycles are then balanced with planning periods so that plans can be released and executed in a compatible cycle with replenishment and delivery. For examble if we can produce on a weekly cycle form a supplier in China, then weekly shipments across the ocean are a good fit to a weekly planning and release cycle. It does matter which day of the week these activities occur otherwise an aditional week in replenishment may occur.

Using synchronized cycles there can be a replenishment execution process put in place where each point in the supply chain has visibility to work on the same customer demand signal. Inventory is then sized between these point to cover the replenishment time and volatility to demand. In this environment only the volatiility needs to be invested as the steady state portion of inventory will either be in process or in transit. This method allows all supplying activity to be based almost soley on demand. By tying this method of demand visibility and replenishment execution all the way through to end customer distribution, customer demand becomes a primary driver of supply chain execution. Key changes that make this possible are: 1) Understanding true supply capacity capability in terms of response, mix and volume order to ship, 2) logistics mechanisms that accommodate repeatable delivery cycles and timings with variable quantities,3) Demand planning and management that ties inventory management to supplier and production plans with a link to replenishment min/max levels, 4) Incorporating a demand plan algorythm that quantifies baseline plans with a volatility portion to the plan and balances this to supply requirements and inventory min/max levels.

These are the basics to moving away from the traditional forecast driven schedule routines and the perils of inaccuracies that drive the supply chain into continual expediting, shortage conditions. Details of incoporating these methods will depend on the type of market, products, supplying processes and management systems are involved. All examples of these transformations make for excellent examples of improving cost, service and growth for the respective Company that is aimed at taking market leadership.

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Show me the Money

For those who are wondering where the pay back is in improvement programs than there are 2 key areas to look at. Based on hindsight being 20/20 and having lived through enough programs to experience what not to do, 1) either the projects and initiatives that made up the program did not take into consideration all of the financials and impacts from operations for the Company, or 2) the program did not tie to market revenue strategies or distribution service well enough to leverage top line. There is a 3rd scenario that incliudes some combination of these two.

The reality is that so many programs focus on small areas of a Company such as a small portion of a factory, a piece of the supply chain with supplier initatives or other segregated areas that have little or no impact to the overall bottom or top line. Cases where we improve a supplier delivery or process only to find that demand has changed volume pricing agreements adversely to wash out the savings. Inventories have been reduced to save working capital only to find that material price increases have offest the valuation to increase per unit inventory rates again washing out the benefit of total unit reductions. Inventory can easily find it’s way back into these post program operations simply by the way we manage and plan for demand. Don’t forget the age old market channel stuffing which usually leads to inflated distribution inventories and subsequent discounting to reduce slow moving inventories.

When it comes to show me the money there is still no subsitute for good operations management, advanced techniques in designing supply chain and demand management techniques and the leadership to drive the Company organizations to common goals and values with a vision. At the foundation of all this is a solid set of performing processes that can be flexible enough to follow markets and diversify products and/or services. Starting with the system as a solution only confuses this objective as the system can only support a solution. People must design the solution to a well performing process as a prerequisite to the system

We all know there are numerous, almost countless tools out there today that promise all of this solution as described above. Truth be told that it really comes down to the right tools, technologies and deployment being put into the right place at the right time. So the next time someone says Show me the Money no matter which side of the table you are sitting on, make sure there is a solid plan that ties across the business, financially and operationally with a tie to market plans and conditions. Without this it doesn’t matter what or how many tools are used in your improvement program, the results and monetary returns will not be there.

Posted in Business Improvement Programs | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hello world!

Welcome to the BPCG llc Blog site.  Our team has received world-wide recognition and accolades from our Customers for the work done in their organizations to optimize their business processes.  BPCG’s Business Process Optimization has given them measurable and significant competitive benefits.  A complete list of our services can be found at our main website, bpcg.us.

We are very happy to provide this as a forum for all reasonable discussions relating to Business Process Optimization.  All we ask is for courtesy and professionalism in any posts you make.

Thanks from the BPCG team for your interest…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment